Weblog
Friday, 20 November 2009
-

Currently
13 1/2 Lives of Captain Bluebear
By Walter Moers
see relatedBullafo
It's easy to see that English is not my ASL prof's first language (she's deaf) when she writes things on the board like "practice each other" or, in trying to teach us a new animal, "bullafo". I love MJ, though; she's tough but we're learning more than we would with any other prof. I hope I have her in the spring, too. Of course, everyone else loves MJ, so they don't tell you who's teaching which class until they start so that students don't all sign up for the same section.
For d-group tonight, Laura and Sharon came over to my place, and I made pizza dough. We had individual pizzas and chocolate chip cookies (from a tube of dough, sort of cheating but still yummy). It's always fun to cook together.
[If you want to make your own pizza dough, mix 1 packet of yeast with 1 cup of water, and then add a little cooking oil and then 3 1/2 or so cups of flour. Knead a lot. You can let it rise or whatever and make a big pizza, four small ones, calzones, or anything else that holds cheese and tomato sauce.]
On Tuesday, I slept from 11pm to 2am and 5:30am to 11am, or something like that. Wednesday and Thursday, Adam and I stayed up late together writing papers, so for each night, I went to bed around 3am and got up at 9/8am. Tonight, I think I'm going to finish this post and go to bed and sleep until whenever, and Sunday, we'll be losing five hours during an overnight plane ride. So, body, I'm sorry. I'll have a normal sleep routine...never.
Tomorrow, I'm going to a PittArts thing at the Carnegie Museum of Art; we're going to have lunch and then learn about some new exhibit, and then we get to do a hands-on workshop and create something. I love art, and I wish Pitt had more fun art classes. But hey, this is free and entertaining; I love PittArts. Because of it, I've gone to the opera, ballet, orchestra, and some crazy plays, all for free. Good times.
My current bathroom book is The 13 1/2 Lives of Captain Bluebear. I highly recommend it if you want a fantasy style that's both simple to read and not dumb at the same time. One critic compares the writer to a mix of Shel Silverstein, J. K. Rowling, and Douglas Adams. That's a great combination. It's also a good book to read a page at a time...
Anyway, I'll miss seeing Clancy over Thanksgiving, but I think Scotland will be pretty neat.
Back later,
Caity
Oh, did I mention I saw New Moon? Because I did. I definitely like Jacob better than Edward. Just sayin'.
Wednesday, 18 November 2009
-
Embracing Ephemora
Last night was the peak of the Leonids meteor shower. I, unfortunately, live in the city--not the best place to try to find safe, dark areas for stargazing. But, after commenting on a friend's Facebook status, I found someone to walk to the park with me to watch. One Facebook message and five texts later, my alarm was set for 2:08 AM.
I heated up some hot (soy) cocoa, put on two pairs of pants and socks, two shirts, and a polar fleece under my winter jacket, and walked the two blocks to the Cathedral of Learning, our campus' main building. [Side note: there is NO academic building better than the Cathedral. We have the Nationality Rooms, the 35-36th floor Honors College, a peregrine falcon nest, and Therapy Dog Tuesdays. And the Common Room looks like Hogwarts. You know you're jealous.]
I met Andrea for the first time, and we walked over to lay on the hill next to Heinz Chapel. After a while of not seeing any stars, we walked over to Shenley Park, a few blocks away. There were several other groups of people on blankets at Flagstaff Hill, so we joined them. With a beautiful view of campus (while sandwiched between CMU and Phipp's Conservatory), we watched the sky and saw a dozen shooting stars. It was well worth waking up and laying out in the cold.
The thing is, you don't just sit quietly while stargazing. You talk. Or, at least, we talked. We talked about our majors, what we always wanted to be when we grow up, our families, the outdoors, science, Girl Scouts, the Lehigh Valley, religion, everything. I could tell you so much about this girl. And I will probably never see her again, because I'm graduating in the spring and she's a freshman. That's one thing that college has taught me, though--take that friendship while you can, even if it's only for a few hours.
I've grown closer to strangers on a fifteen minute bus ride than I did with many of my peers throughout high school. I've bonded with people over a smile in passing on the street, a debate about some public issue as we waited in line. I've prayed with people whose names I'll never know--and I embrace that.
Some friendships are made to last for a lifetime, but some are just for a moment. And that makes them no less meaningful--just different. God moves people in and out of our lives as we need them, and sometimes, as they need us. Just to talk and have someone listen, to offer advice, to bond for a few hours, that's what life's about. I now can see just how important these people are to my life, even if only for a short time. And even if I never see them again, I'm thankful for the time we had.
Monday, 16 November 2009
-
I Love Science
I've officially decided: if I hadn't ended up a dual psych/religion major, I would have studied astrophysics. Seriously. Adam says he thinks it's interesting, too, so maybe we'll take up that study when we're past our current formal education. Anyway, Strangebrain posted the videos from and link to http://www.symphonyofscience.com/ and I must say, it is fantastic. I have a huge intellectual crush on Carl Sagan (sorry, Adam), Bill Nye is amusing, and Stephen Hawking is fascinating.
Interestingly enough, watching those videos made me think about how we define religion. There are two broader traits that religions commonly share: they help humans become less self-absorbed (defeat the ego) or they give meaning to life. I know two people who are antiquarians in the religious sense--they find their meaning in studying the ancients (Greek language for one and ancient Jewish history for the other). If history can act as their religion, then I think it follows that for others, science can fill that spot. And I can see how the awe of the awesomeness of the universe can do just that.
Sunday, 15 November 2009
-
Was the Reformation Worth It?
I went to a "Foundations Seminar" today with my apartment-mate. It was at the office for her church, City Reformed. They're part of "Presbyterian Church in America"; I'm confirmed "Presbyterian Church, USA". They tend to be a little [okay, a lot] more conservative than I in beliefs about, well, everything. Anyway, here are the notes I took; you might find them interesting. I didn't realize quite what separated Catholics and Protestants other than loyalty to the Pope, transubstantiation, penance, and some little stuff about Heaven. The class was a look at the differences between Catholics and Protestants at the level of beliefs that can be found in catechisms (not just what people say). The "-" are my thoughts and questions against the Protestants, and the "+" are my thoughts that support them.
---
1. Scripture and TraditionCatholic beliefs: the Holy Spirit works through living, apostolic Tradition; Scripture and Tradition are equal
Reformed beliefs: Sola Scriptura (Mark 7:5-9, Col. 2:8, Jer. 23:28-30)
-: Scripture according to whom--who gets a license to interpret?C: Bishops and Popes-: How did the Bible come about? Wasn't the choice influenced by Tradition?
R: no one may "bind the conscience" of the believer--we won't believe on command because someone tells us to, but must actually believe it after reasoning through (Acts 17:11, 19:8); teachers can offer their views, based on the Westminster Catechism
-: If there's no authority on right and wrong interpretations, how can we go against those who commit atrocities in the name of Christ, using "Biblical support"?
-: seems revisionary, if there is no proclaimed absolute interpretation
+: burden to go out and seek understanding and not be content to have someone spoon-feed you truthsR: PCA pastoral candidates can list their objections to the Westminster Catechism as they go through examination; the Catechism isn't a perfect, inspired document-: Why isn't it perfect, but the Bible is? Weren't both compiled by councils?
Side notes on Salvation:
C: somewhere, it says that one can potentially achieve salvation through adhering to one's conscience; it's in Romans 2:12-16 and sort of mentioned in the Catechism
R: Protestantism = intellectual freedom-: that's pretty great, but when does someone become wrong to the point of not achieving salvation?2. Forgiveness and Assurance of Heaven
-: Why do we disagree if it doesn't seem to matter? Why do we have tens of thousands of denominations and worship separately if it's trivial things keeping us apart? (trivial = not related to whether you get saved or not)C: Baptism removes Original Sin, but you can fall out of Grace if you sin; sin = no faith = needs a second conversion; there is no way to say that you know you are going to Heaven; penance acts as a second baptism (because "we believe in ONE baptism" and can't do it again with water*); Church can forgive, good works aid in forgiveness (sincere acts of worship and devotion)*Fun side note: everything in the creeds is there because some random Christian cult used to believe it. So, some group was out there preaching that, if you sinned, you could get re-baptized to take away that sin. Hoorah!
R: Sola Fide (John 6:29, 20:31; Acts 15:9; Romans 3:20a, 27-28, 4:5, 11:6; Gal. 2:16; Eph. 2:8-9)
-: Say someone murders another person. If she was baptized, will she go to Hell? Or was that baptism not "real" in the first place, if it didn't keep her from sinning?
-: How can we know for certain that we are of the Elect?R: well, we'll never be completely sure...+: possible to have a sense of peace, knowledge that you're going to Heaven
+: take insecurities directly to God instead of to other humans (Priests/Bishops)
3. Mortal and Venial SinC: Mortal sin: intentional, grave violation of God's law, requires reconversion; Venial sin: small or unintentional, less serious4. Forgiveness and Absolution
R: No sin too small not to damn, no sin to big to prevent salvation (Luke 16:10, Matt. 12:34b-37, 5:21, 27; Romans 3:20-23; Gen. 6:5); God wants us to be perfect
[Holiness tradition: we can, in fact, be perfect]
-: Does the distinction only matter if the repentance (way of fixing it) differs?
-: If we're saved and cannot fall out of Grace, why do we need repentance?+: maybe it matters more for those outside of Grace?
R: No sin is "worse", so why do we hate those who are murderers, sex offenders, etc.? We shouldn't look down on them because of their sins, because we are sinners, too.C: Priest is gatekeeper who dispenses forgiveness (can't go directly to God); indulgences for self and others, like an accounting systemThis is a pretty fantastic flow chart from "The Gospel According to Rome" that explains how Salvation and sin work in the Catholic church; check it out!
R: be confident! (Acts 18:38; Romans 8:1, 15-16, 31-33; John 3:18a; Phil. 1:6)
-: If Grace received is a permanent thing, then if you stop believing in God, what happens?
+: we should want to repent of sin--sin is icky!
http://gospellightbiblebaptist.com/insidepg/gar.html
5. CommunionC: it is a work of redemption being carried out; reparation of venial sins; transubstantiation makes it a real sacrifice on Christ's part; it is active, giving merit; worship of the ElementsWhy the pageantry of the Catholic church would have been appealing back when Christianity started:
R: (Heb. 9:24-26, 10:11-14) no second sacrifice/offering; importance of proper administration; we're perfected, and we're being sanctified; does not bring merit
+: priesthood of all believers
-: cause of many Protestant differences, too: Zwingli, Calvin, Luther
"Where's your God?" "Uh, He's in Heaven..."
"Where's your sacrifice?" "Uh, our sacrifice has already been done, so we don't have anything to do..."
"Where's your priest?" "Well, we're all priests..."
Having something to show is starting to look good, when the rest of your faith is so intangible.
6. Veneration of MaryC: there are levels of praise: devotion is just below worship; Mary is exalted as queen, is sinless, helps intervene for our salvation; devotion is intrinsic to Christian worship
R: Solo Christo (Ex. 20:4, 34:14; Luke 4:8; Rev. 22:8-9; Isaiah 42:8, 48:11b; Jer. 44:16-23; Matt. 12:46)
-: Do we need a female to venerate, since it's usually "Father" God and the male Christ?R: God can relate to you, even though He hasn't walked exactly in your shoes--has no need to be both male and female-: Can women only be perfected as virgins like Mary?
Side note: more on gender in the Church
There is no sexual relationship in the Trinity; our God doesn't have sex (but is that just because the pagan gods did it, and we didn't want ours to be like theirs?)
Both male and female are necessary to represent God; if leadership is male (because of Father God and male Christ), where do women fit in?We are all called to be both "sons of God" and "brides of Christ"--yes, that means the girls are sons and the boys are brides.Conclusion
The Church is female. (uh, okay, whatever that means) We don't venerate the church, so we don't need to venerate Mary.
Why should leadership be male? Is Jesus' male-ness more important than His human-ness?R: "Let the children come to Me": don't put intermediaries in the way of people's relationships with God--we don't need Mary, the Saints, or our Priests to stand in between us and God---
The guy leading the talk: Catholicism has a whole lot of impediments to your relationship with Christ--so, friends don't let friends be Catholic...
As you can tell, I sort of took sides with the Catholics in a lot of things. For some people, I think Catholicism is the best way to reach God. I do see that it has a lot of things that keep people from having a pure relationship with Christ, though. I guess I just want everyone to meet in the middle and get along.
What are your thoughts? Did I misrepresent either side in a way that needs to be corrected? And what do you think of the Catholic/Protestant divide?
Saturday, 14 November 2009
-
How comfortable are you when it comes to talking about sex?
There is nothing wrong with the human body or asking questions about it and its functions. To that end, I will answer [almost] any question you throw at me, and though, depending on the audience, I won't always volunteer personal info, I will be quite happy to share all the biological trivia I know. I loved A&P! And sexuality is fascinating. In some situations, it's really, really awkward to bring it up, but I think I can handle talking to anyone about sex.
(Also, when I was in high school, I helped out with the Junior High sexuality program at church. Talk about awkward: my mom, my sister, and I think my boyfriend's sister all participated in it.)I just answered this Featured Question; you can answer it too!
Katja88
-
- Name: Caitlin
- Country: United States
- State: Pennsylvania
- Metro: Pittsburgh
- Birthday: 4/21/1988
- Gender: Female
- Member Since: 1/12/2005
-
True
Weblog Archives
Don't worry - your calendar is here… to see it in action just click "Save"
above and refresh the page.
