Weblog

Thursday, 12 November 2009

  • My Beef with Augustine

    You, sir or madame, are the product of Augustinian Christianity.  Augustine influenced Thomas Aquinas, Martin Luther, pretty much every important theologian.  So, how did this happen, and what does it mean?

    Augustine was born in 354 CE, pagan turned gnostic turned mainstream Christian.  In everything he did, he strove for perfection.  So, when he finally became a Christian, he wanted to be the BEST Christian.  [Dr. Denova said that Augustine had the biggest ego (and libido) of anyone...] 
    Augustine decided he wanted to be a bishop, so he took his vows and lived a life of physical chastity.  However, he couldn't stop thinking about sex, and that bothered him.  He thought maybe it would go away, but when he found out that a 72-year-old man in his congregation was fathering a child, he gave up all hope.
    Strongly influenced by Greek philosophy, Augustine decided he should be able to control everything about his body, and his mind.  But, since no one, apparently, could control their own thoughts, it mustn't be their fault!  With no knowledge of DNA or genetics, Augustine decided that the inability to control one's thoughts (about sex) was inherited.
    So, Augustine went on a mission to find backing, going to the place he was sure he would be proven correct--Genesis.  And he stumbled upon the story of the Fall...
    First, he looked at Genesis 2:25, "The man and his wife were both naked, and they felt no shame."  Then, he turned to Genesis 3:7, "Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they realized they were naked; so they sewed fig leaves together and made coverings for themselves."
    Augustine decided that something must have happened in there to make them ashamed of their nakedness.  And, since he couldn't stop thinking about sex, he decided that must have been it.  Augustine thought that God created sex to be passionless, just like any other natural function--going to the bathroom, eating, scratching your head--and that the moment lust entered the picture, something bad happened.  The newly created soul received a black mark on it from that lust: Original Sin.  And, of course, Original Sin is genetically transmitted, from parents to child.  Sex should have been passionless, as per God's design, but humans ruined it and thus, themselves.
    Augustine wrote 150 books, 600+ treatises, and countless letters, and as the "Vandals were at the gates", a monk of his saved the works and put them in a library, to be referenced by future generations.  Augustine became the theology of the Middle Ages.

    And this is where I bang my head repeatedly against the wall...

    Regarding Augustine: why do we put so much credibility with one person?  And he mainly studied Paul, if that matters to you.  You can spout all the "inspired by God" ideas you'd like, but I won't bite.

    And this dude is responsible for our whole concept of bodies and sex in the Western world.
    Seriously, isn't a little passion necessary to make all the parts work correctly?  Why did God put so many nerves there if we weren't supposed to enjoy it?  Why does sex become sinful just because one man, 1,700 years ago, couldn't keep it in his psychological pants?  I mourn the shame related to the human body in our culture, the taboos on everything related to sex.  It's not a healthy attitude to hold.  Where would we be if the monk had just let the library burn?

    And now you know what Original Sin is really all about.

  • Random Bits of Life

    My weekend spent in Gettysburg was beyond words, as usual.  I am so in love with him.
    ---
    Now, my concerns lie with me not getting sick (was upper respiratory, but might move to lower, boo).  I've been polling people on their favorite homeopathic solutions to help with that.  So, here's the list:

    • drinking lots of water...check
    • getting extra vitamin c...check
    • tea with honey...check
    • echinacea tea...check
    • chicken soup (easy in the Crock-Pot!)...check
    • wearing a scarf/staying warm...check

    • extra sleep: I'm a college student with a paper due yesterday (and who visited her boyfriend over the weekend), so I'll be working on that one this afternoon and tonight...
    • oregano: it's supposed to help clear out the sinuses; I made a tea with it last night...
    • garlic: it's supposed to help the lower respiratory tract; I made garlic-oregano tea, and it wasn't too gross, but next time, I'd add some salt or something
    I think garlic and oregano might be why chicken soup can be good for you, but if you factor in vitamin c, it seems to me that if you're sick, you should consume copious amounts of tomato sauce?  Hmm...

    But to show just how desperate I am not to get sick, I've been trying:

    Yeah.  It's gotten that bad.  See, the thing is, I still don't get why you would want the feeling of having water up your nose.  But, it seems so far to help.  The way it works is this: you pour salt water in one nostril and have it come out the other.  That helps A) get rid of some snot and B) keep the nasal passages moist.  Mom swears by it (a recent development, since I've gone to college), so I'm giving it a shot.  And it's not horrible, but I don't plan on making it a daily habit.

    Believe me, I use modern medicine.  I got my H1N1 vaccine last Tuesday.  But, I'd rather use other preventative measures and save the drugs for when I need them most.
    ---
    In other news, I had a rough draft of a paper due today, about "the troubled self" in Islam.  I wrote a lot about the Greater Jihad and stuff like that.  If you know anything about that, please let me know; I need as much help as I can get.  But more on Islam for another entry.
    ---
    My good buddy Wittgenstein won't leave me alone, even though we're onto a different section in my Problems class.  I was on a friend's Facebook, and his little "write something here" box said:
    The statement below is true.
    The statement above is false.
    Now how do you make sense of that without Wittgenstein?  Ol' Ludwig would just sort of nod his head at that and keep walking.  It's a language game, and nothing more, something for silly people to think about.  He's my kind of guy.

    I thought about that again in West today.  We were discussing the Trinity and Christology, things that no one has ever been able to satisfactorily explain to the masses without using the word "mystery" (or a synonym).  Witt wouldn't worry about it.  He'd say, "It's okay that it doesn't make sense.  Just go along with it."  And we'd be relieved and wipe our brows and the world would be a slightly less stressful place.

    But I know people wouldn't be satisfied with that.  Well, whatever.
    ---
    My final thought for the afternoon is based off of the books of Albert B. Randall, which I read for my West paper.  I find the whole thing especially relevant right now, as we think about the fact that the Fort Hood gunman is a Muslim.  Randall does a comparative look at the Bible and the Qur'an and determines that the Hebrew Bible (Old Testament) has dozens more calls to murder than the Qur'an.  If you want to justify any sort of genocide, just look in the OT.  My paper itself is on jihad as a spiritual war, and for the majority of Muslims, that's their reality.  Jihad is supposed to be internal, and they would never think of waging a war of guns against anyone.  I hate the media for portraying otherwise; because whether our Islamic brothers and sisters are right or wrong in their beliefs, they don't deserve to be viewed the same as the few extremists out there.  It's like judging all of Christianity for the cults that advocate mass suicide or abuse to women and children.  That is NOT the majority.

    However, that's not what caught my attention when reading Randall.  I'll post for you a few paragraphs I found interesting, and you can comment on what you think.  Holy Scriptures as Justifications for War, pg. 127-128:

    Given the purpose of this book, it is fitting to end this lengthy chapter by examining the Flood, which if taken literally attributes to God an act of human slaughter that makes the body count of Katrina look like a Boy Scout picnic:
    [Genesis 6:5-8 and 11-13, look it up yourself]
    If taken literally, this single passage distorts God into the greatest mass killer in history.  The only intelligible and moral answer to the dilemma posed by a God, who in a fit of anger destroys every single human and beast alive except for the chosen few on the Ark, and the God of love, forgiveness and compassion affirmed in the Sermon on the Mount is by understanding the change from henotheism to monotheism that occurred in the nearly one thousand year writing period of the TANAKH--see the next chapter.  There is, however, another way to reconcile the dilemma, but while it is intelligible it is not morally or theologically acceptable.  If one wishes to maintain that God is omnipotent (all-powerful)--omnipotence requires omniscience (all-knowing)--then taking the flood account empirically as literalists do creates a serious moral and theological dilemma.  If God is omniscient as almost all Christians believe, then God knew that he would destroy every human alive but Noah and his family even before the first act of creation.  Thus, the literal God of the Flood is not only a mass murderer, who slaughters the innocent--fetuses, infants, children--together with the guilty, but even worse, God knew that this would be a consequence of His creation.  The only logical way out of this dilemma for literalists is to deny God's omniscience.  But this response is totally unacceptable, not only to literalists, but to the overwhelming majority of Christians.
    ---
    What do you think?  Can you justify everything and remain a literalist?
    And can you offer me any better solutions to fixing my cold?

Friday, 06 November 2009

  • I'm sorry, some Christians are jerks.

    We're not all like that, and they're misrepresenting our God.  We're sorry.

    I think we need to start a campaign for that.  In chapter 11 of Blue Like Jazz, Donald Miller talks about how he and his friends made a reverse confessional and put it out on campus.  When people sat in it, instead of hearing their sins, they confessed and apologized for all the heinous things Christians have done in the name of God over the ages.  I think we, as a faith, need to do that and make amends for how we have failed God and His message.

    Here's the thing: there are many ways to evangelize.  I'm sure each one fits a certain culture or a certain time, but not all of them fit 21st century America.  And one of those doesn't-work-anymore methods is spreading the gospel through fear.

    Fear?

    Fear.  I've received several dozen tracts over my time here at college in the city; usually, they're hospital workers on lunch breaks.  I have received ONE that did not speak of how you will go to Hell if you don't believe in Jesus.  I read that one tract, and it made me think about my faith.  The rest of them?  They ended up in a recycling bin or a drawer.  This culture is not one that is responsive to the message of fear, of repenting to avoid Hell.  People don't believe that anymore.  They're not open to it; they're quite happy to go on being invincible, without your silly comic book that tells them how terrible they are.

    That fear might have worked a hundred years ago; it might even have worked fifty years ago.  It doesn't work now, not in most of America.

    And fear especially doesn't work when you include yelling and gruesome pictures. 

    Here's the thing: I don't care if you're pro-choice or pro-life, I don't care if you're homophobic or not, I don't care if you hate stem cell research, want more women pastors in the church, care to save the environment, don't like our president, want to pull all of the troops out of Iraq.  You can have your beliefs.  This goes for everyone, though.

    Yelling them on street corners does not convert people to your beliefs.  It makes them uncomfortable.  They're not going to come over to you to learn more--they're going to cross at the corner and walk on the other side of the street.  It pushes people away.  And the nasty pictures are just going to do that more so. 

    All of your scare tactics push people away, and it makes it harder for the message to get through.  So, how should we be representing Christ and our beliefs?

    Love.

    People need to know that they are loved.  Your lifestyle, your actions show more about your beliefs than anything else.  What's the right way to witness to people?  Talk to them.  Show Christ's love.  Make friends before you try to talk to them about war or abortion or whatever it is about which you're convicted.  Telling them that if they don't agree with you, they get to spend eternity in a lake of burning sulfur, is just going to harden them against you.

    And please, please, be able to back up your beliefs if you want me to agree with you.  A friend studying in the medical field said that he wishes people with a stance on abortion would talk to the doctors and patients who have been involved in them.  Get personal perspective, get unbiased facts (not just from your favorite pro-life website--might that not be just a tad biased?), and study up on it.  If you are using scripture, make sure to go back to the Greek and Hebrew to know you aren't misquoting it, and remember the importance of context, both the verses around it and the history behind it.  I'm not going to give you the time of day if I think your beliefs are completely ungrounded.

    If nothing else, we need to just LOVE people.  Separate the sin from the sinner.  If you believe homosexuality is a sin (and have backing for your beliefs), that's fine--but do not make my friend feel unwelcome in the church.  God does still love him; nothing we do can separate us from the love of God.  And you should love him, too, even if you don't condone his lifestyle.  You're not going to go to Hell for befriending a homosexual, or any sinner.  Jesus himself did it!  So, welcome them, everyone.  Give God's love, and sneak in your little agenda after the fact.

    So, to all the non-Christians out there, I apologize for my brothers and sisters who have yelled at you on street corners and told you that your lifestyle was going to send you to Hell.  I'm embarrassed at their actions.  Not all Christians are like that; not all Christians necessarily believe that.  The truth is, God loves you, and that's all that matters.  Please, keep giving us Christians a chance.  We're not all jerks.

    What is your opinion?  How can we best reach others with our message?  Have you been hurt by Christians?  Would you like to join a "Some Christians are Jerks" movement?

Sunday, 01 November 2009

  • Firefly Knowledge FAIL

    Caity: my sister dressed up as who?
    Mom: lake tam....from some tv show (firefly, maybe)?
    Caity: river tam
    Caity: lol
    Mom: ah, yes
    Caity: win
    Mom: it's all bodies of water
    Mom: and all goofy!
    Mom: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMWi7CLoZ2Q&feature=related

    (I highly recommend the link, best minute and ten seconds I've had online all day...)
  • Walk to Friendship Park

    I grabbed my new MP3 player, a hoodie, and a hat and walked out the door.  I had one "goal" for my walk--to get some exercise in the nice weather.  That turned into a few more--not to think too much and not to be bothered by backtracking.  That's one that always gets me; I'm horrible about never taking the same road twice.  So, walking down one block cul-de-sacs is not my cup of tea, but I did it today anyway.  I wanted to walk places I've never been before, so I did.

    Right around the time I was ready to head back, I hit "Friendship Park".  It's a pretty little place; it reminded me of "Diamond Park" in Meadville, a loop with one way streets encircling it.  The park was next to a hospital.  So, I decided that I would walk the loop and then come back to go down a street that looked interesting (and I later realized would lead me right back to the 54C bus route, which I followed to get back to my apartment).

    As I was finishing the loop, I noticed someone sit down on a bench; I thought I heard a sob.  And I decided that I would go over and talk to that person.  It was a stretch, even for me, but I'm glad I did.  I talked to the girl for at least a half hour.  She's a high school freshman; her grandmother was in the hospital.  She had a lot on her mind, and she shared it all with me.  It's amazing how we'll open up to strangers.

    I hope I made her feel better.  Maybe this step out of my comfort zone brought some comfort to her.  We'll probably never meet again (she's moving to NJ at the end of the year), but our lives are intertwined.

    Maybe I'll walk by the hospitals a little more often.

Katja88

  • Visit Katja88's Xanga Site
    • Name: Caitlin
    • Country: United States
    • State: Pennsylvania
    • Metro: Pittsburgh
    • Birthday: 4/21/1988
    • Gender: Female
    • Member Since: 1/12/2005
    • True

Weblog Archives

Don't worry - your calendar is here… to see it in action just click "Save" above and refresh the page.